movieswaphd pornogaga.net indan sixe
chodne ka video bestsexporno.com jharkhand sex girl
رقص تعرى meeporn.net نيك مايا دياب
hot bhabi.com teenpornvideo.mobi aurat ki chuchi
sexu vidio nanotube.mobi nisha xx
قصص عبط orivive.com اجمل مهبل
sexyvedeo bukaporn.net kannada sex movie download
indian nude girls justerporn.mobi hindi bur ki chudai
odia blue film video erodrunks.net ashwini bhave nude
hot bhabhi dance tubezaur.mobi picnic porn
tamilnadu sex movies sikwap.mobi movierulz ag
jyothi krishna nude big-porn-house.com bangla sex videos
母の親友 生野ひかる freejavmovies.com 初撮り人妻ドキュメント 皆本梨香
mob psycho hentai cartoon-porn-comics.com 2b hentai manga
punjabi porn videos pornodon.net pusy porn com

The court satisfied the claim of Moscow judges against the founders of “Dissernet”

The court satisfied the claim of Moscow judges against the founders of “Dissernet”

[ad_1]

On March 15, the Gagarinsky Court of Moscow fully satisfied the demands of Moscow judges Anna Starodub and Pavel Markov against the founders of “Dissernet” Andrey Zayakin and Andrey Rostovtsev. The judges demanded to recognize “defamatory and unreliable” information about plagiarism in their dissertations. This was reported by the Center for the Protection of Mass Media Rights.

The court ordered the founders of “Dissernet” to publish rebuttals, to pay compensation for moral damages in the amount of 10 thousand rubles in favor of each of the plaintiffs, and also declared illegal the use of personal data of judges on the project’s website. According to the court’s decision, access to the website pages with information about judges should be blocked.

Ekaterina Shmyghina, a lawyer at the Center for the Protection of Media Rights, who represented Andrey Zayakin’s interests in court, believes that the decision cannot be called legal. It will be appealed.

“Dissernet” experts analyzed the dissertations of the judges and came to the conclusion that they may contain a large amount borrowed from scientific texts published by other authors. After that, the judges were left with academic degrees, but later the court canceled the corresponding orders. In the summer of 2023, judges filed almost identical lawsuits for the protection of honor, dignity and business reputation, writes the Center for the Protection of Mass Media Rights.

[ad_2]

Original Source Link