movieswaphd pornogaga.net indan sixe
chodne ka video bestsexporno.com jharkhand sex girl
رقص تعرى meeporn.net نيك مايا دياب
hot bhabi.com teenpornvideo.mobi aurat ki chuchi
sexu vidio nanotube.mobi nisha xx
قصص عبط orivive.com اجمل مهبل
sexyvedeo bukaporn.net kannada sex movie download
indian nude girls justerporn.mobi hindi bur ki chudai
odia blue film video erodrunks.net ashwini bhave nude
hot bhabhi dance tubezaur.mobi picnic porn
tamilnadu sex movies sikwap.mobi movierulz ag
jyothi krishna nude big-porn-house.com bangla sex videos
母の親友 生野ひかる freejavmovies.com 初撮り人妻ドキュメント 皆本梨香
mob psycho hentai cartoon-porn-comics.com 2b hentai manga
punjabi porn videos pornodon.net pusy porn com

In the Moscow DEG, Putin won a record and Davankov lost

In the Moscow DEG, Putin won a record and Davankov lost

[ad_1]

Moscow became the only region in which the difference between the number of physical and electronic votes in the presidential elections became a record simultaneously for Vladimir Putin and Vladislav Davankov from “New People” – but with the opposite sign. This follows from an infographic published by electoral expert Roman Udot.

In Moscow, Putin received 89.1% of electronic votes, which is 12.3 percentage points more than paper votes. Davankov won 4.4% of electronic votes, which is 6.9 percentage points less than paper votes. Both values ​​became the maximum among regions in which remote electronic voting (DEG) took place.

On average, in Russia, Putin gained 2.9 percentage points more in the DEG than on paper, and Davankov – by 0.61 percentage points, Kommersant calculated. Mykola Kharitonov from the Communist Party of the People’s Republic of Ukraine almost everywhere gained less than in the physical districts, and Leonid Slutsky from the LDPR – the same.

The expert with whom “Kommersant” spoke believes that such results are the result of voters’ distrust of the DEG (mainly the electorate of the CPRF and opposition-minded Russians) and “corporate mobilization”. By the latter, he probably understands cases of administrative coercion of voters to vote, which contradict the Constitution and Russian election laws.

[ad_2]

Original Source Link