movieswaphd pornogaga.net indan sixe
chodne ka video bestsexporno.com jharkhand sex girl
رقص تعرى meeporn.net نيك مايا دياب
hot bhabi.com teenpornvideo.mobi aurat ki chuchi
sexu vidio nanotube.mobi nisha xx
قصص عبط orivive.com اجمل مهبل
sexyvedeo bukaporn.net kannada sex movie download
indian nude girls justerporn.mobi hindi bur ki chudai
odia blue film video erodrunks.net ashwini bhave nude
hot bhabhi dance tubezaur.mobi picnic porn
tamilnadu sex movies sikwap.mobi movierulz ag
jyothi krishna nude big-porn-house.com bangla sex videos
母の親友 生野ひかる freejavmovies.com 初撮り人妻ドキュメント 皆本梨香
mob psycho hentai cartoon-porn-comics.com 2b hentai manga
punjabi porn videos pornodon.net pusy porn com

EU state institutions can prohibit employees from wearing religious symbols – a court decision

EU state institutions can prohibit employees from wearing religious symbols – a court decision

[ad_1]

The EU Court has ruled that public institutions in all EU countries can prohibit employees from wearing religious symbols, including hijabs.

This was reported by The Guardian with reference to the resolution.

Such a decision was argued by the need to create an “absolutely neutral administrative environment”.

However, the court noted that prohibitions on clothing or symbols associated with philosophical or religious beliefs should apply to everyone equally.

The EU Court called the ban on the wearing of religious symbols by employees of state institutions legitimate. Photo: Myvisuals/Depositphotos

It all started with a situation that happened in Belgium with a Muslim woman. She was forbidden to wear a hijab at work, although her duties did not involve much contact with other people.

Shortly thereafter, the municipality introduced changes to working conditions. He demanded that all employees observe strict neutrality.

The employee filed a complaint with the local court. She noted that the ban is discriminatory and violates the right to freedom of religion.

The court said that openly demonstrating one’s religious beliefs is prohibited, but small and implicit details are allowed. In particular, it is about wearing earrings with a cross or holding Christmas parties.

The institution appealed to the EU court with a request to assess whether the neutrality rule is discriminatory. He ruled that it is an “objectively justified legitimate aim”.

At the same time, national courts have “freedom of discretion”, that is, they can decide for themselves how to balance individual rights and the neutrality of the public service.

It will be recalled that in French schools it was forbidden to wear Muslim abayas – traditional dresses with sleeves.

[ad_2]

Original Source Link